NOTE: this is still a draft, so it's subject to changes. This alert will be removed as soon as final version will be available

πŸ—οΈMulti-Chain Architecture

Chain Integration Framework

HSuite's multi-chain architecture enables seamless integration of new blockchain networks through a standardized framework that maintains security, compatibility, and performance across all supported chains.

πŸ—οΈ Core Integration Components

Component
Description

πŸ”— Chain-Specific Smart Registry

Metadata and security configuration adapted for each blockchain's unique features

⚑ Network Adapters

Custom integration layers that handle chain-specific transaction formats and consensus mechanisms

πŸ” Multi-Chain Validator Network

Distributed validator clusters that operate across all integrated chains

🌐 Cross-Chain Communication Protocol

Standardized protocol for Smart Apps to interact across multiple chains

πŸ›‘οΈ Security Guard Systems

Automated security monitoring and threat detection for each integrated chain

πŸ“Š Performance Monitoring

Real-time monitoring of network health and performance metrics across all chains

πŸ”§ Technical Implementation

πŸ“š Smart-Ledgers Library Architecture

HSuite's multi-chain capabilities are powered by the @hsuite/smart-ledgers library, which provides:

Unified Interface Layer:

// Single interface for all supported chains
interface ILedger {
  accounts: IAccounts           // Account management
  tokens: IFungibleToken       // Token operations  
  nfts: INonFungibleToken      // NFT operations
  transactions: ITransactions  // Transaction handling
  storage: IStorage            // Storage/consensus ops
  crypto: ILedgerCryptography  // Security operations
}

Chain-Specific Adapters:

  • HashgraphAdapter: Integrates with Hedera Hashgraph via @hsuite/hashgraph plugin

  • RippleAdapter: Handles XRP Ledger operations and native features

  • Extensible Design: New adapters can be added for additional blockchains

Multi-Chain Controllers:

/multi-chain/
β”œβ”€β”€ storage/              # HCS for Hedera, native consensus for others
β”œβ”€β”€ accounts/             # Unified account management  
β”œβ”€β”€ fungible-tokens/      # Cross-chain token operations
β”œβ”€β”€ non-fungible-tokens/  # NFT operations across chains
└── transactions/         # Transaction queries and management

πŸ›‘οΈ Configurable Validator & Security Architecture

Three-Tier Security Model:

// Security level determines signature requirements
async generateMultisigOfMultisig(
  nodes: Array<SmartNodeEntity>,
  threshold: number,
  smartAppPublicKey?: PublicKey,
  securityLevel: 'none' | 'partial' | 'full'
): Promise<KeyList> {
  switch (securityLevel) {
    case 'none':    // App-only signing
    case 'partial': // App + operator threshold signatures  
    case 'full':    // Full operator control via validators
  }
}

Security Level Integration:

  1. Rule Storage: Validators stored via consensus services (HCS for Hedera, native for XRPL)

  2. Security Assessment: @hsuite/validators applies appropriate security level

  3. Signature Verification: Enforces signature requirements based on chosen security level:

    • None: Smart-App signature only

    • Partial: Smart-App + SmartNode operator signatures required

    • Full: Complete validator rule enforcement with operator control

  4. Chain-Specific Execution: Valid transactions proceed to chain-native operations


πŸ’‘ Why Choose Different Security Levels?

πŸ”“ Scenarios for App-Only Control (None)

Development & Innovation:

  • πŸš€ Rapid Prototyping: Quick iterations without approval bottlenecks

  • πŸ§ͺ Experimental Features: Testing new concepts without network consensus delays

  • 🎨 Creative Freedom: Artists and creators maintaining full control over their NFT collections

  • ⚑ Real-Time Applications: Gaming or interactive apps requiring instant responses

Business Requirements:

  • 🏒 Private Enterprise: Companies wanting complete control over internal business logic

  • πŸ“Š Data Sovereignty: Organizations with strict data control requirements

  • 🎯 Custom Workflows: Unique business processes that don't fit standard validator rules

  • ⏱️ Time-Sensitive Operations: Applications where approval delays could cause business losses

βš–οΈ Scenarios for Shared Control (Partial)

Production Applications:

  • πŸ’° Financial Services: DeFi apps requiring security but maintaining operational flexibility

  • πŸ›’ E-Commerce: Marketplaces balancing user experience with fraud protection

  • 🀝 B2B Integrations: Business partnerships requiring mutual consent for operations

  • πŸ“± Consumer Apps: User-facing applications needing security without complexity

πŸ”’ Scenarios for Full Decentralization (Full)

High-Stakes Applications:

  • πŸ›οΈ Institutional Applications: Banks and institutions requiring maximum security validation

  • πŸ’Ž High-Value Assets: Applications managing significant financial value or rare NFTs

  • 🌍 Public Utilities: Community-owned infrastructure requiring democratic governance

  • βš–οΈ Enterprise Security: Applications requiring maximum security and audit trails

  • πŸ” Security-Critical: Applications where a single mistake could cause significant harm

Trust & Transparency:

  • πŸ—³οΈ DAO Governance: Community decisions requiring transparent, immutable validation

  • 🌐 Public Goods: Open-source projects benefiting from community oversight

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Audit Requirements: Applications needing verifiable security and transparent operations

  • πŸ‘₯ Multi-Party Systems: Scenarios where no single party should have unilateral control

🎯 Key Insight: Security level choice reflects the trade-off between control and trust. Developers can start with full control during development, move to shared control for production, and eventually choose full decentralization as their application matures and requires maximum community trust.

Configurable Validation Types:

  • Consensus Operations: Topic creation, message submission, rule storage (security level dependent)

  • Token Operations: Creation, minting, burning, transfers with flexible security (security level dependent)

  • Account Operations: Creation, updates, permission management (security level dependent)

  • Custom Rules: Extensible validation system with developer-chosen security levels


βš–οΈ Validator Type Architecture

Based on the HSuite validator system, new chains integrate through specialized validator types:

  • πŸ”— Chain Validators: Verify chain-specific transaction formats and consensus mechanisms

  • πŸŒ‰ Cross-Chain Validators: Handle asset transfers and state synchronization between chains

  • βœ… Security Validators: Ensure network security standards and operational requirements are met

  • πŸ“ˆ Performance Validators: Monitor network performance and adjust parameters dynamically


πŸ”§ Technical Integration Requirements

  • ⚑ Native Transaction Support: Ability to create, sign, and broadcast transactions on the target chain

  • 🀝 Consensus Participation: Integration with the chain's consensus mechanism for validator operations

  • πŸ“Š State Query Capabilities: Real-time access to chain state for validation purposes

  • πŸ‘‚ Event Monitoring: Ability to listen for and respond to on-chain events

  • πŸ” Multi-Signature Support: Compatibility with the SmartNode multisig-of-multisig architecture


πŸ› οΈ Integration Process

πŸ—οΈ Comprehensive 12+ Month Integration Timeline

πŸ’° Financial Requirement: Each new chain integration requires $2M in funding to ensure proper development, security, and deployment. For detailed funding breakdown, see Tokenomics & Multi-Chain Economics.

Phase
Duration
Description

1️⃣ Chain Assessment & Planning

6-8 weeks

Deep technical compatibility analysis, security model evaluation, and integration roadmap development

2️⃣ Core Development

12-16 weeks

Chain-specific adapter development, validator implementations, and smart-ledgers library integration

3️⃣ Smart Registry Configuration

4-6 weeks

Comprehensive setup of metadata, security parameters, and chain-specific configurations

4️⃣ Internal Testing & QA

8-10 weeks

Extensive internal testing, unit tests, integration tests, and performance optimization

5️⃣ Security Audits

8-12 weeks

Multiple independent security audits by tier-1 blockchain security firms

6️⃣ Penetration Testing

4-6 weeks

Comprehensive penetration testing and vulnerability assessments

7️⃣ Stress Testing

6-8 weeks

Load testing, performance benchmarking, and scalability validation

8️⃣ Testnet Deployment

8-12 weeks

Extended testnet deployment with community participation and feedback integration

9️⃣ Cluster Deployment & Setup

4-6 weeks

Production SmartNode cluster deployment with new chain support

πŸ”Ÿ Mainnet Soft Launch

4-6 weeks

Limited mainnet deployment with controlled access and monitoring

1️⃣1️⃣ Full Mainnet Rollout

2-4 weeks

Complete mainnet integration with full feature availability

1️⃣2️⃣ Post-Launch Monitoring

8-12 weeks

Continuous monitoring, optimization, and community support

πŸ“Š Total Timeline: 12-18 months (depending on chain complexity and audit findings)

πŸ” Security-First Approach: The extended timeline ensures maximum security and reliability before any new chain goes live, protecting both the HSuite ecosystem and user funds.


🎯 What's Next?

Explore related aspects of the HSuite ecosystem:


← Back to Main Index | ← Previous: Multi-Chain Development Challenge | Next: Tokenomics Model β†’

Last updated